Rich, high-quality media assets may be delivered consistently and affordably with the aid of CDN. Reduced bandwidth costs, increased scale, and shortened delivery times are three difficulties that CDNs help video and audio streaming firms tackle. The Walt Disney Company, for instance, owns the internet video streaming service Hulu. It employs Amazon CloudFront to continuously stream over 20 GBps of data to its expanding client base.
Directly uploading video material to your website might strain your server and reduce its functionality. Sites that provide videos can help in this situation. You may submit your video material to third-party video hosting websites safely and easily without worrying about concerns with storage, playability, or quality.
Which video hosting service should you use, though? The best host for you will depend on your needs as a business, your budget, and how you use video on your website. In this post, we’ll show you the top websites for hosting professional videos online and offer some expert advice on how to pick the platform that will work best for you.
However, if you have longer videos, SoundCloud may be more suitable as it offers better audio quality and an easier way to share audio files.
YouTube:
With more than 100 million daily active users, YouTube is the undisputed leader in the field of video-sharing websites. Three formerly employed people at PayPal founded the platform in 2005. It’s unclear how the notion originated because each of the three people involved has a different explanation.
Videos may be up to 12 hours long and there are no storage or bandwidth restrictions. Because YouTube is a Google property, search engines favor it above other video-based websites. This indicates that YouTube videos have a higher likelihood of appearing on Google’s first page of search results, giving you greater exposure.
YouTube exclusively employs the AVOD monetization model, however it also offers YouTube subscriptions, which function similarly to subscriptions. Basic analytical tools, YouTube Live streaming capabilities, social media sharing capabilities, embed codes, and more are included.
Benefits:
- Totally free
- Preferred by Google
- Unlimited bandwidth and storage
- Existing large viewer base
- Easy content management and monetization
- Totally free
Disadvantages:
- Non-customizable player and no white-label options
- Non-transparent demonetization criteria
- Easily abusable flagging system
- Poor client support
- Weak security features
2. Vimeo:
One of the first video-sharing websites, created in 2004, is called Vimeo. It was first developed to make sharing videos from its sibling network, College Humor, simple.
If you want to create your own OTT service and monetize content through subscriptions, Vimeo may be an excellent option as it also provides a dedicated OTT platform. Last but not least, Vimeo also provides HLS streaming capability for live streaming.
Vimeo doesn’t provide limitless storage. Depending on the plan you select, you can host a certain amount of material. Generally speaking, the package covers 250GB every year up to a total of 7TB.
A variety of tools are available on Vimeo to make it simple to produce, manage, and distribute movies. Vimeo primarily focuses on content creators.
Benefits:
- Customizable HTML5 player
- Video creation tools
- OTT support
- Excellent privacy settings
Disadvantages:
- No ad-supported monetization
- The free plan is quite limited
- Storage and bandwidth limitations on fine print
- Fewer viewers than YouTube
3. Uscreen:
Uscreen offers a wide range of connectors, including those with Mailchimp, Leadzen, Google Analytics, and other services. Additionally, live streaming is a possibility, but it’s only included with the costliest subscriptions.
Uscreen can be the right platform for you if you’re looking for ways to monetize your YouTube channel. It provides a clear and easy approach to build an OTT website and monetise your content by charging users to access a variety of OTT streaming services. Both TVOD and pay-per-view are supported.
Benefits:
- Intuitive and powerful CMS
- Comprehensive OTT building tools and support
- Several monetization options
- A long list of third-party integrations
- High level of security
Disadvantages:
- Live streaming and OTT support are reserved for the most expensive plans
- Any ad-based monetization tools
- Slow customer support
- Very expensive compared to other platforms
4. Dailymotion:
Similar to YouTube, DailyMotion is free, but it charges its creators a cut of the money generated by advertisements. A free video hosting company like Dailymotion may be the best option for you if you’re seeking a hosting solution with the lowest upfront cost.
In terms of features, DailyMotion and YouTube are very comparable. There is unlimited hosting accessible, however there are restrictions on the amount and length of movies you may post. Live streaming support is offered, there aren’t many analytics tools, and video monetization relies on advertising.
Benefits:
- Second largest video platform
- For free
- There is no limitation of bandwidth and storage space
- More lenient content policy than YouTube
- Customization and branding tools
Disadvantages:
- Poor security and lots of piracy issues
- Limited analysis
- Geared towards political content
- Videos can be up to 60 seconds long
5. Facebook:
Your videos have a potential audience already out there. After all, Facebook is used by everyone, from Baby Boomers to Gen-X. It’s simple to share and embed videos that are hosted on Facebook. Finally, you can always improve your video’s performance with Meta Business Suite if you’re not satisfied with how it’s doing.
Facebook may not be a platform specifically for uploading videos, but it does provide capabilities that some businesses would find beneficial. To begin with, Facebook does not impose bandwidth or storage constraints, nor does it set a limit on the amount of films you may post.
Benefits:
- Unlimited uploads and bandwidth
- Large existing audience
- Easily shareable and embeddable
- Live streaming is available
- Completely free hosting
Disadvantages:
- Strict limitations on file size and video length
- Not a dedicated hosting platform
- Strict video monetization criteria
- No player customization or white-labeled platforms
6. TV:
Your videos have a potential audience already out there. After all, Facebook is used by everyone, from Baby Boomers to Gen-X. It’s simple to share and embed videos that are hosted on Facebook. Finally, you can always improve your video’s performance with Meta Business Suite if you’re not satisfied with how it’s doing.
Facebook may not be a platform specifically for uploading videos, but it does provide capabilities that some businesses would find beneficial. To begin with, Facebook does not impose bandwidth or storage constraints, nor does it set a limit on the amount of films you may post.
Benefits:
- Advanced ad-based monetization features
- Lightweight, customizable HTML5 player with adaptive bitrate streaming
- In-depth video analysis
- Live streaming support across multiple devices
- Intuitive and easy to navigate CMS
Disadvantages:
- SVOD monetization is only available through third-party integrations
- Unlimited storage and encoding available only on paid plans
- CMS can create a learning curve, as it is designed for business
7. Vidyard:
You don’t have to pay for anything you don’t need since it’s like ordering a la carte. With Vidyard, you can improve your videos’ total value by raising conversion rates and viewer engagement.
The premium video hosting services that Vidyard provides for corporations are fairly comparable to those of Wistia. Plans can be changed to just include the features you choose.
Benefits:
- The starter plan includes 20 videos.
- It supports 4K and 360-degree videos.
- It has a very customizable video player.
- The player includes interactive calls to action.
- It’s easy to share and embed videos on your site.
Disadvantages:
- It is not transparent about enterprise pricing.
- It is a bit expensive for new businesses.
8. Jetpack:
Automatic backups, downtime tracking, and limitless file hosting are just a few of the features that come with Jetpack.
The best WordPress video hosting service platform is Jetpack, which is a cheap substitute for Wistia and Vidyard. Although the service initially comes paired with personal plans, it does provide a free plan to get you going.
Benefits:
- There is no storage cap with the Professional Service Plan.
- It is designed for WordPress sites that require video hosting.
- It is ad-free and optimized for WordPress.
- You can easily host and embed videos on your site.
- You can customize the player with CSS.
Disadvantages:
- Jetpack has a bad reputation for slowing down websites.
- You need to install a plugin on your WordPress site.
